Alpine A290 or Mégane E-Tech: real-world consumption compared
Alpine A290
vs Mégane E-Tech.
Both models side by side, with real figures from cars tracked by Sparks. Not a spec sheet: what drivers actually drove and used.
Alpine A29014 tracked carsSee the model →
Mégane E-Tech38 tracked carsSee the model →
Side by side
The numbers, line by line.
- Average consumptionEstimatedAlpine A290: 3.3mi/kWhcarried by 50 of 1,120 tripsMégane E-Tech: 3.5mi/kWhcarried by 150 of 3,530 trips
- Manufacturer figure (WLTP)Alpine A290: 3.8 – 3.9mi/kWhmanufacturer figure (Alpine A290 brochure, June 2026)Mégane E-Tech: 3.9 – 4.0mi/kWhmanufacturer figure (3 Renault brochures)
- Distance drivenMeasuredAlpine A290: 12,200miles1,120 tripsMégane E-Tech: 34,200miles3,530 trips
- Energy chargedDerivedAlpine A290: 800kWh60 sessionsMégane E-Tech: 2,800kWh240 sessions
Distance and energy depend on how many cars are tracked: only consumption compares directly. 179 of 236 cars broken down by model.
Month by month
Consumption, month after month.
- Aug 2026
- Sep 2026
Different drivers, different trips: the gap mixes the model with how it’s used (trips, speed, season). It tells you what Sparks cars actually do, not what the same car would use on the same trip.
Go further
More numbers.
Alpine A290Every figure for the model, month by month.Mégane E-TechEvery figure for the model, month by month.The whole fleetEvery model, charging, cold and speed.
A comparison only exists for two models with enough cars: at least five behind every figure.
And how much does your car use?
Free. In testing on iPhone, Android and OpenR Link.
Coming soon to theApp StoreComing soon toGoogle Play
Using Kelec? Kelec or Sparks: the comparison · Compare Sparks with other apps